安全美工刀

Name: 安全美工刀
Brand: Slice
SKU: 10550
Price: 22.99 USD
Availability: OutOfStock
Rating: 4.4 (17 reviews)

Slice 10550 Manual Utility Knife with Slice 10526 Utility Knife Blade (Rounded Tip)

SKU编号 #10550

(17 评价)

商品描述

Slice 10550安全美工刀是我们3款安全美工刀款之一。提供了5段手动刀片伸缩，让使用者可以依照工作需求自行调整刀片长度。生产过程更使用了Slice独特安全打磨刀刃。和其它刀款一样，这款安全美工刀采用了坚固耐用的玻璃填充尼龙手柄及寿命更持久的可替换刀片。Slice的陶瓷刀片有着无火花、无磁性及具化学堕性等特性，不但不生锈，还能承受高达摄氏1600度的高温。

刀柄类型:5段式伸缩
耐用型玻璃填充尼龙刀柄
兼容刀片: 10526, 10528
使用独特的安全刀片，且较钢制刀片保持锋利时间长11倍
减少伤害，降低成本
无火花、不导电刀片
双手通用设计
附有挂绳孔，让您能方便携带
更换刀片无需使用工具
更换刀片次数越少 = 伤害越少
SKU编号 #10550

兼容刀片

产品规格

切割深度: 20.0 mm

产品重量: 66.0 g

产品尺寸: L 153.83 x W 35.64 x H 21.18 mm

材料: GFN, POM, carbon steel, zirconium oxide

可下载内容

下载这些PDF挡案来获取更多关于安全美工刀的信息

评价

4.4 / 5

17 评价

Danielle Blier

1 month ago

Great alternative to a box blade! Totally love Slice products, work great while providing the safety my company wants. Especially LOVE that they donate a percentage of sales to Autism!
0 replies
Danielle Blier

2 years ago

Good quality
0 replies
Narelle Urli

2 years ago

Really good happy with these.
0 replies
Mark Scott

3 years ago

great product and makes a perfect gift
0 replies
Robert Vail

3 years ago

Good
0 replies
Susan MacKinnon

3 years ago

easy use and the blade does not stay open
0 replies
Robert Phillips

3 years ago

Great product works as advertised.
0 replies
Larry Longstreth

3 years ago

I would like to see these products shipped with a pointed blade not the rounded one.
0 replies
Deborah Mahan

3 years ago

Slice knife returned - did not cut well without using a lot of downward force. Would not recommend.
0 replies
Marlene Van Bibber

3 years ago

Great item and fast shipping.
0 replies
Bob Wendlick

3 years ago

Great new tool for us. I would recommend this product to anyone cutter open cardboard boxes.
0 replies
Jigar Patel

4 years ago

Perfect for safety and quality.
0 replies
Francois Chenard

4 years ago

Great service and a great product!!!
0 replies
Darbi Reyes

4 years ago

Again great product but expensive.
0 replies
Dustin Warner
0 replies